After receiving a lot of heat of my article about Obama being the Anti-Christ, and how he is undermining our government already by using President Carter to make peace with terrorists, I took yesterday off to clear my head. (As if anything is there!)
The result was even more questions. One reader reminded me that even Nixon had the foresight to visit China. Well, China wasn't bombing other people or trying to force their religion on the whole world. He visited them purely to start taking their money. Remember he was sent packing also.
At the debate last night, some chinks in Obama's armor started to show. When both candidates were asked , what would happen, "if Iran obtains nuclear weapons and uses them against Israel?" Clinton replied forcefully by saying, "An attack on Israel would incur massive retaliation by the United States," While Obama replied, "The U.S. would take appropriate action."
Does that mean Obama will TALK to them? Where's the loyalty to our strongest ally?
Then digging an even deeper hole for himself, Obama was asked to detail his ties to William Ayers, the former member of the Weather Underground, which was responsible for bombings at the Pentagon, the Capitol and other federal buildings. His stupid reply? "This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood, who's a professor of English in Chicago who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from." He also said, "He's not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis," "And the notion that somehow as a consequence of me knowing somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago, when I was 8 years old, somehow reflects on me and my values doesn't make much sense," Clinton pushed back. First, she challenged Obama's assertion that he has only tangential ties, saying they had served together on the Woods Fund board. Then, she said Ayers' comment that he wishes he had set more bombs - published, coincidentally, on Sept. 11, 2001."
Just what did Obama exchange ideas about with this terrorist?
When the subject of that lunatic Reverend Wright arose, Obama tried to cover up again by saying," "You know, the notion that somehow that the American people are going to be distracted once again by comments not made by me, but somebody who is associated with me that I have disowned, I think doesn't give the American people enough credit." However, Obama quickly clarified that he disowned the comments, not Wright.
Question: Doesn't that mean you believe in the man and his hatred of whites?
I also have observed lately that on most talk shows, they invite some large black celeb to their show and ask who they intend to vote for. Naturally they always say, "Obama". Are they being paid to subliminally inject our brains to vote for a man who obviously has a lot of unfavorable positions in his closet.
Is this going to be a vote that turns into the Blacks vs. Whites?
