In an attempt to realize the self actualized acquiescence to effect in word usage as a human-tendancy set series as to word set series it's self whatever, we realize a vast sense of difference truncated as well with variable and various tendency to words. In some cases in the most tried aspects of historical juncture create those almost aphoristic pools of consecrated trust in primordially momentary meanings. In some cases it is what we consecrate meaning in - death - and in some, great discovery, I would assume a three hundred and sixty degree personality-telliologixcally neither human or earthly- that moves to discovery in what molar knowledge will supply to our glimpses of time and moment.
When I discover younger generations repeating knowledge of previous generations that was consecrated at junctures of disaster it is only demonstration of weakness in the lack of allowance for the experience of history to feel it's stasis and allow the future to transcend, "the road to hell is paved with the best of intentions" or, we determine our experience in the future as we see ourselves in it.
To describe difficulty and use the word struggle means that if we encounter a previous cultural value attached to the word we are particularly exclusive to our experience or relative identification to definition, even if or assuredly that one might deny any at all.
Telliologically there is a peculiar locus of terminus where force is denied - [ as if ] you live - [ if ] you live,
if you live - one example of phrase in a refractive continuation, culturally there are a macro set of cogent rationalizations to assume contiguous capability towards a real synthesis.
In terms of a flat capability communication and systems, phone, internet, end to end mobile, sat mobile, television and film, variously, word sets appreciate as transferability of common concept or fracture applies. An "Information Routing Group" (or "IRG"), Erdos k+1, complete graph theory, or (X-1)(1/2X)+1 aside, we trust knowledge as a telliological inversion of history with out the attendant ecotypic failure.
In the struggle of perspective to provide a gift of relevance to perspective that is to say for example, "bitch" in a "bubble" or to define bubble as a possible extenuation of a simple pattern, quaternistic or otherwise, or to request reflection for examination of assembly:. not for an intentional appreciation of individual, but a type of threat assessment is more intrinsically rude than a castigation of perspective per se in usage of "bitch" simply because it is a word.
To add to the post mortem of theoretical eytem and fracture the difference of structure and feminine quietude is to say perhaps from my male perspective that to speak, "spiritually" is similar to the difference twixt circular distervia and judeo-christian or parabolic structure and the atypical "house" or definitions of intrusion. I don't live in my House.
I have as well asked of some to soften from overuse of bored tones, like "gay" or ..."sigh (boredom) this is gay" when intentionally they mean "pedestrian" happen to enjoy the libidinal assumption.
From a primordial essential wordness our primary phenoms are expletive and differ in a similar fractive repetitive sense or individual human set series, respond to the less semiotically truncated and determinably essential or real phonetic integers so, the smaller the word the more difficult it is too castigate as a peculiar function of teleological essence as we concern climate realities.
