<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>nominee</title>
<link>http://www.newsflavor.com/tags/nominee</link>
<description>New posts about nominee</description>
<item>
<title>Sarah Palin: A Wrong Choice for America</title>
<link>http://www.newsflavor.com/Opinions/Sarah-Palin-A-Wrong-Choice-for-America.247537</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>How in the world can Sarah Palin be a VP nominee with an ongoing Ethics inquiry?  In addition, a whole shipload of other problems to bring to the White House.  These include a special needs child, pregnant teenaged daughter, and who knows what else.   How can you be a competent mom, grand mom and run this country.  Even all working moms know it is next to impossible.   Hypothetically, if she were to accomplishment the task, someone will lose out.  It will be the American people.  She is going to be there for her baby and grandchild.</p>
<p>You got to be kidding that, John McCain and the GOP allowed this type of pick to occur.  Sarah Palin has continuously mentioned about being against the Old Washington establishment.  That's a bunch of crock in itself!  Her husband is in the oil industry.  She has so many loopholes and skeletons until it is pathetic.  To me, I don't see maverick.  I see switching when it's convenient.  If I were Republican, I question her loyalty to the party.  It seems that there's a new characteristic of presidency which is sleazy!</p>
<p>Also, how can you compare a VP selection to a Presidential nominee?  You can't do it!  It is funny that the GOP has tried to compare this dark horse with a history of drama in her life to a well established politician.  It simply won't work.  Remember, the American people have already spoken with him being the Democratic nominee.  The GOP has allowed John McCain to make the worst political move in History!  He should have selected Mitt Romney! Let's watch and see how this one plays out.</p><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsflavor.com%2FOpinions%2FSarah-Palin-A-Wrong-Choice-for-America.247537"><img src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsflavor.com%2FOpinions%2FSarah-Palin-A-Wrong-Choice-for-America.247537" border="0"/></a>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 08:56:42 PST</pubDate></item>
<item>
<title>Governor Sarah Palin is a Logical Republican Choice</title>
<link>http://www.newsflavor.com/Opinions/Governor-Sarah-Palin-is-a-Logical-Republican-Choice.239817</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>First of all, Sarah Palin enjoys an image as a maverick, an image the Republican Party very much needs for its leaders as the party faithful attempt to gain distance from the disgraced figures of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney in this election year. &amp;ldquo;Maverick&amp;ldquo; is an image McCain is losing as millions of voters realize that McCain was never much of a maverick at all, is surrounded by big oil and other corporate lobbyists for advisors, and voted with Bush in the Senate 95% of the time.</p>
<p>There is nothing &amp;ldquo;maverick&amp;rdquo; about being a sidekick.</p>
<p>Palin, however, is regarded as a maverick for at least two reasons that could seem genuine. Firstly, she &amp;ldquo;cleaned up&amp;rdquo; the Alaska state capitol of corruption. However, by all knowledgeable accounts, there is still plenty of corruption going on with the members of the Republican Party, the Far North contingency. Not all those Republican office holders who have been investigated in Alaska have gone to court yet. Governor Palin, though, is extending herself credit deserved for appearing to trying to clean up the party act, and after she herself had supported Republican Senator Ted Stevens on his multi-million dollar bridge to nowhere scam. The wily Republican then quickly withdrew her support for her old Republican friend when &amp;ldquo;Bridge to Nowhere&amp;rdquo; became a scandal. This shows that Sarah Palin is not only a maverick, if you insist, but she can flip-flop like the best Republican who has something to hide or be embarrassed about.</p>
<p>Despite being a flip-flopper, however, and one who knows that self-preservation is the first order of business, Governor Sarah Palin can be seen as a maverick in a very radical sense: Palin once belonged to a small, far right wing party that occasionally called for the secession of Alaska from the United States.</p>
<p>Whether she's fully American or not, &amp;ldquo;maverick&amp;rdquo; Governor Sarah Palin is associated, and in the family way, with big oil. That makes her more Republican than maverick. Palin would continue the Republican Party's marriage with that polluting, profit gouging, corrupting industry as any Bush/Cheney Republican would. Palin would be another oil person  in the White House, just as McCain would be, a fact that's realized once McCain's energy policies and energy associates are brought to light.</p>
<p>Governor Sarah Palin is also a woman who would deny a woman's right to choose. Given the presidency, she would appoint to the Supreme Court enough justices to overturn Roe vs. Wade and deny the will of the majority of voters, another Republican thing these days. At the same time, of course, as a conservative, she is a staunch champion of individual liberties.</p>
<p>Never let it be said that getting away with things, and calling yourself a hero when you've been something other than that, isn't admired by some of the people, all of the time.</p>
<p>Sarah Palin's other qualifications to become Vice President of the United States (and perhaps the President of the United States) is her experience as the governor, for less than two years, of  the 47th most populated state. She is also a logical Republican candidate for Vice President as Palin has no experience in national or international politics. Ignorance or lack of experience has been no barrier before to Republicans when they pick their candidates for the executive branch. In fact, dumbed down candidates are thought to relate better to common voters (and there must be something in that). Sarah Palin's ignorance of John McCain's policy on Iraq, for example, when he picked her to run as Vice President, should be of no concern. It would not break protocol. And after all, somebody on the Republican owned corporate media said Palin is a quick learner.  One may suppose (and should believe) that Alaska Governor Sarah Palin can move beyond getting an &amp;ldquo;A&amp;rdquo; in survival and image making and move on up and out into the arena of policies and positions and programs. She'll just need a little help with spin, as others have received. And we are living with the results of the success of Republican deceptions.</p>
<p>The former beauty contestant (she came in second) and TV station news chair rose to power after a spell as mayor of a town of under 7,000 people. That alone, some Republicans will argue, has provided Palin with  the experience she would need should she become President of the United States after the death or faltering health of a President John McCain, a 72-year old man who has twice been the victim of cancer.</p>
<p>On the job training has been tried in the White House before by the Republican Party. But no matter. Whether ignorance or inexperience is an issue or not with regard to Palin, she fills yet another requisite for the Republican Party's  vice presidential nominee: Alaska Governor Sarah Palin is under investigation for an ethics charge. The charge in question (or not) is that she abused her power as governor by firing her safety commissioner after he refused to fire, on Governor Palin's urging, a state trooper who was getting a divorce from Palin's sister.</p>
<p>Abuse of power has been a trait in leading Republican office holders for at least the last 40 years.</p>
<p>As if the tendency to abuse power were not enough of a qualification, Palin also suits as the VP nominee as the Republican Party, the Party of Family Values: although Palin has been an advocate of abstinence-only as a method of birth control (or behavior control), her teenaged daughter is pregnant.</p>
<p>Nothing more qualifies a Republican as a candidate for any public office than a history of hypocrisy and failure. And getting away with it all. Alaska Governor Sarah Palin is a highly suitable, very logical choice to become the next Republican Vice President of the United States.</p><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsflavor.com%2FOpinions%2FGovernor-Sarah-Palin-is-a-Logical-Republican-Choice.239817"><img src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsflavor.com%2FOpinions%2FGovernor-Sarah-Palin-is-a-Logical-Republican-Choice.239817" border="0"/></a>]]></description>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 06:45:53 PST</pubDate></item>
<item>
<title>Is John McCain the Right Choice for America?</title>
<link>http://www.newsflavor.com/Opinions/Is-John-McCain-the-Right-Choice-for-America.203485</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>The GOP seem to be bashing Barack O'bama in on several key issues important to the American people today, yet John McCain receives little if no press time explaining what he will change for the people.  We all know all the hoopla - just about everything there is to know about O'bama, what about John McCain?  I think it is important to know how is he going to change the current state of the economy and help it improve.  I meant, it is honorable that he is a war heroe, but what about real issues.  We need help with foreign relations and yes, we need a mediator or some sort to strategically end this war.  The way everything currently stands, inflation is bound to rise real soon.  Then what will he do?  So I beg the question, is he really right for America?  Is the GOP just  trying to put someone in office as a filler, not as a real president.   I mean, he hasn't said nothing different than Bush.  W e should be scrutinizing McCain just as must as O'bama.  Really, we need to know what was his stance on important issues five years ago.  So I say to all McCain's people, NO MORE OF THE SAME!!</p><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsflavor.com%2FOpinions%2FIs-John-McCain-the-Right-Choice-for-America.203485"><img src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsflavor.com%2FOpinions%2FIs-John-McCain-the-Right-Choice-for-America.203485" border="0"/></a>]]></description>
<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 23:42:18 PST</pubDate></item>
<item>
<title>Barack O'bama: Has He Expanded the Capabilities of a Presidential Nominee's</title>
<link>http://www.newsflavor.com/Opinions/Barack-Obama-Has-He-Expanded-the-Capabilities-of-a-Presidential-Nominees.190231</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama has expanded the do's and don'ts notion of presidential nominees and taken it to another level. How many presidential candidates take their political campaigns abroad to see what is really happening on the foreign level?  Not may as far as I know.   He basically earned lots of brownie points with foreign leaders on the global level.   He even has other leaders ready to send troops to assist the United States in fighting terrorism whom initially declined to help.  I really believe that if Barack O'bama is elected President of the United States, we will achieve a peace that we have not seen in years.  Do you think Hillary would have thought of such a thing?  I don't think so.  O'bama is  definitely building his portfolio with experience.  I can't say the same for John McCain.  Even he agreed that O'bama made a positive impression by visiting other countries.  Sounds like a concession to me. But let me get back to my original point, Obama has strategically reached levels of influence and aspirations no other candidate has mastered in this millennium.</p>
<p>He outsmarted Hillary on just about every level her campaign could come up with.  They include: constant mudslinging,attacks on his wife,his patriotism, inexperience, his former pastor's remarks and foreign policy to name a few.  O'bama was still able to ride the tide of ridicule and advance unscathed. He definitely came from behind and  won.  I still say he's the underdog.  I find it ironic that McCain has stated that he's the underdog and not O'bama.  I don't believe that is possible because his party is in power and typically the party in power has no difficulty receiving his parties nomination.  So quite naturally, he has not really survived the constant negative attacks that come from the media.   Also, his visit to Iraq and other countries solidifies his political notebook.   Barack O'bama has reached a level of political strategy never seen before.  I hope he continues to make strides in our political process more positive.  Let's wait and see.</p>
<p>&amp;nbsp;</p><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsflavor.com%2FOpinions%2FBarack-Obama-Has-He-Expanded-the-Capabilities-of-a-Presidential-Nominees.190231"><img src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsflavor.com%2FOpinions%2FBarack-Obama-Has-He-Expanded-the-Capabilities-of-a-Presidential-Nominees.190231" border="0"/></a>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 04:07:25 PST</pubDate></item>
<item>
<title>Farewell, to Hillary!</title>
<link>http://www.newsflavor.com/Opinions/Farewell-to-Hillary.130921</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>I really admire Hillary Clinton for her fervent personality and the tenacity that she fights with.  But, the Oval office is not the place where she will show her voice.  Let's be perfectly honest, this fight is definitely over.  Obama is the sovereign winner for the Democratic nomination.  She gave a long, hard fight.  Yet, face it. She will be bided good bye and return to the Senate where she can still knock some punches and be heard for the people of New York.  They can be proud to say she is their senator.  She can even be an advocate for the poor, women, blue collar workers and the like.  So I say to Hillary, "Farewell, and job well done!</p><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsflavor.com%2FOpinions%2FFarewell-to-Hillary.130921"><img src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsflavor.com%2FOpinions%2FFarewell-to-Hillary.130921" border="0"/></a>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 04:03:03 PST</pubDate></item>
<item>
<title>Riding a Wave: Barack Obama</title>
<link>http://www.newsflavor.com/Politics/Riding-a-Wave-Barack-Obama.127187</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>There was an amazing rally in a town called Pendleton,
 
Oregon. Seventy-five thousand people, came out to the
 
rally yesterday, to hear Senator Barack Obama speak,
 
as he laid out his aspirations for the country and all
 
Americans. This was certainly the largest crowd yet,
 
to attend a rally, to hear the Senator speak, since his
 
campaign began, when he declared his intentions to
 
run for president, in Springfield, Illinois.
 
At the end of last week, the Senator was swinging back,
 
at Senator John McCain, and President Bush, after the
 
President spoke at a parliamentary meeting in Israel,
 
which was in the midst of celebrating Israel's sixty
 
year anniversary. The President included in his remarks,
 
words to the effect that people should not engage in talks
 
with known terrorist nations, which could be appeasement,
 
such as was done with the Nazi's during World War 1, or
 
which some wanted to do with Hitler, the President even
 
mentioned someone possibly saying &amp;ldquo;Oh if I had just been
 
able to talk to Hitler, maybe none of that would have
 
happened.&amp;rdquo; Appeasement, as some have said is not talking.
 
The president's position is we do not talk to heads of state,
 
whose country, is known to practice terrorism.  This is very
 
interesting, because the same day or the day before, Defense
 
Secretary Robert Gates was proffering, along with Secretary
 
Rice, that the United States, try to engage or re-engage with
 
Iran, in diplomatic talks, regarding particular matters, unrelated
 
to nuclear weapons, as far as has been reported. So obviously,
 
Secretaries Gates and Rice, did not get the memo from the
 
President.
 
What the President said, was then taken up by John McCain,
 
who the President, was implicitly trying to help politically.
 
Senator McCain took the stance that Obama was inexperienced,
 
na&amp;iuml;ve, and reckless, to suggest that we talk to Iran without pre-
 
conditions, Senator Obama term was a bit different than pre-
 
conditions, but the talks would begin at a lower level than the
 
presidency. Senator Obama took the bat and tried to hit it out
 
of the park. By most accounts, Obama at least, hit in a two
 
runner,  out of the park. So by McCain's version, we stay in Iraq
 
for one hundred years, don't talk to Iran who may be developing
 
nuclear weapons, and this will make us safer here at home. There
 
fore, it would follow then, according to Senator Obama, Ronald
 
Reagan was wrong to negotiate with the Soviet Union, John F.
 
Kennedy should have not negotiated, during the Cuban Missile
 
Crisis. Strange these views, certainly, because the United States,
 
is currently negotiating with North Korea, and in the past, the
 
government, negotiated with the country of Libya, over the
 
shooting down of a plane, and then accepted Libya back into
 
the fold of  &amp;ldquo;allies&amp;rdquo;.
 
Senator Obama asks the question, how is it that Iran has increased,
 
its influence, its power and its danger to other nations, he feels it
 
is because of  the President's war on Iraq, which used to be a buffer
 
against Iran, that buffer does not exist anymore, Iraq has been
 
basically sown asunder. All this, according to Senator Obama, with
 
Senator McCain serving as wing-man, for President Bush, McCain,
 
wants to &amp;ldquo;double-down&amp;rdquo; on the President's policies, and endorses
 
the President's war plan, according to Senator Obama.</p>
<p>Senator
 
McCain did criticize the handling of the strategy of the war by
 
former Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld, who eventually resigned.
 
Mr. McCain also supported the &amp;ldquo;surge&amp;rdquo;, which he feels, has been
 
a success.
 
Senator Obama was thrust into the limelight, without asking,
 
when the President and Senator McCain made their statements.
 
Mr. Obama seemed to welcome the fight, and he said he was
 
ready to have this debate about the safety and protection of
 
the country, anytime, anyplace, anywhere, because he feels
 
that the country has been made less safe, by the policies of the
 
current White House, in the face of the Iraq war, and Senator
 
John McCain, has backed the White House all the way.
 
In the meantime, Senator Hillary Clinton, has been placed on the
 
back page of many minds, the campaign purchased a newspaper
 
advertisement last week, and had to call television commentators,
 
to ask them to talk about the ad, it seems to have gotten to that
 
point.</p>
<p>At this time, Senator Obama needs a little over one-hundred
 
delegates to reach the needed, two-thousand, twenty-five
 
to claim the nomination. There are fifty-two delegates at stake,
 
in Kentucky, and one-hundred and twelve, in Oregon. Senator
 
Obama's share will be around seventy-two or so, if my numbers
 
are correct. He would then need about fifty-eight delegates to
 
shut the race down. Senator Clinton says, she has the most
 
popular votes, if you include Florida and Michigan, but that's
 
another story.  The Democratic party rules, state that the one
 
who has won two thousand, twenty five delegates is the nominee.</p>
<p>Senator Clinton, will try to make the argument to the Super
 
delegates, that she is the better candidate, who has won the
 
most popular votes.
 
The massive wave of seventy-five thousand, supporters at the
 
rally yesterday, seems to belie her contention. Senator Obama
 
by the dust up last week, his insurmountable wins, the
 
undeclared, crowning of him as the presumptive nominee, has
 
him, riding a wave of enthusiasm, forward to the General election
 
against Senator John McCain.   So now, let the race begin.</p><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsflavor.com%2FPolitics%2FRiding-a-Wave-Barack-Obama.127187"><img src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsflavor.com%2FPolitics%2FRiding-a-Wave-Barack-Obama.127187" border="0"/></a>]]></description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 06:09:37 PST</pubDate></item>
<item>
<title>Obama Will Succeed Despite the West VA Loss</title>
<link>http://www.newsflavor.com/Politics/US-Politics/Obama-Will-Succeed-Despite-the-West-VA-Loss.124564</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday, voters in West Virginia cast their ballots to pick their candidate for the Democratic primaries.  More than half of the voters chose Hillary Clinton over Obama on this day.  Is it surprising?  Probably not!  These are not very well-educated voters.  Also, these voters are loyal to her husband, former president, Bill Clinton. It is not surprising that they chose his wife over Obama.  Yet, the question is?  Is this enough to beat Obama?</p>
<p>Well, let's see.  I don't think so.  For one, he's beating Hillary in his count for delegates by a substantial rate.  Second, he still has the popular vote.  Third, she has used too much mudslinging to be president.  Next, she's disenfranchised the majority or even all of her African-American voters.  Last, Obama has outsmarted her in more ways than one.  As you can see, I can go on and on.  It's evident you need to throw in the towel when just about everyone is screaming, "Hillary, end your campaign!"</p>
<p>Now, despite the fact that Hillary picked up most of the delegates in West Virginia is not indicative that she has picked up enough stem to win.  Remember, Obama is already in the lead.  He picked up five more delegates.  She's still far behind him in her count.  Either way, Obama will win the Democratic Party nomination.</p><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsflavor.com%2FPolitics%2FUS-Politics%2FObama-Will-Succeed-Despite-the-West-VA-Loss.124564"><img src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsflavor.com%2FPolitics%2FUS-Politics%2FObama-Will-Succeed-Despite-the-West-VA-Loss.124564" border="0"/></a>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 05:49:22 PST</pubDate></item>
<item>
<title>Obama: Our Next President</title>
<link>http://www.newsflavor.com/Opinions/Obama-Our-Next-President.121602</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>Can't you see it now?  Obama will be taking the oath of office with his wife by his side.  How historic this moment will be in November after the general election.  Well, early on in the race for the Democratic nomination, I made the prediction that Hillary should drop out of the race.  I even wrote an article to that respect.</p>
<p>Let me explain a little of the reasoning behind my comments.  First of all, we as the American people do not necessarily want a female president.  For goodness sakes, she cried when she lost one of her primaries.  We all know that shows weakness.  It's more like, the more I learned about Obama, I'm like," to heck with Hillary!"  It's kind of like a stigma attached to her that won't go away.  Hypothetically speaking, had she been the nominee; we all know who her husband is. Duh, former president, Bill Clinton.  That in itself has bad vibes stemming from it.  Then on the other hand, you have Obama.  He has been put him through the mud and back.  I must admit, he's still standing strong.  She even engaged in scandalous mudslinging.  Obama was hanging on like the underdog or is he?  He's definitely a dark horse candidate.</p>
<p>To sum everything up, Obama is a unifying figure/presidential candidate.  He represents both races that for decades have had differences.  Now, its like, the same people whom were denigrated and put down will be the same mixed race that leads this country to worldwide peace.   When I see Obama, I don't say here's a black president. I say that's our American president.  He can relate to both white and black.  He will be our next president.  Let's watch and see.</p><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsflavor.com%2FOpinions%2FObama-Our-Next-President.121602"><img src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsflavor.com%2FOpinions%2FObama-Our-Next-President.121602" border="0"/></a>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 05:49:39 PST</pubDate></item>
<item>
<title>Hillary Should Drop Out of the Race</title>
<link>http://www.newsflavor.com/Opinions/Hillary-Should-Drop-Out-of-the-Race.118309</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>As everyone knows, Hillary Clinton has lost a lot of her stronghold on voters in her core voter base.  She has lost female voters, African American voters , low-income, male voters and the like.  Her number of superdelegates is waning too.</p>
 
<p>As well, she is losing in her ability to raise funds for her campaign.  Hillary was once determined and witty.  Now she has engaged on an attack of Barack Obama&amp;rsquo;s character.  She is simply doing a lot of finger pointing instead of informing the American people about her policies and platform.  This is simply bad politics and mudslinging.   In retrospect, Barack Obama has the popular vote and he is the best choice to beat the G.O.P.&amp;rsquo;s nominee, John McCain.  It is not feasible for Hillary to continue with her vie for the Democratic nomination.  She has fallen too far behind.</p>
 
<p>In addition, her top aide was endorsing issues that she opposes.  That is a clear indication that her campaign is falling apart or has fallen apart.  Somehow, Illinois Senator Barack Obama has convinced the American people, more importantly; the Democrats that he is their nominee.  If Hillary drops out at this point and give Barack Obama her endorsement; then this will allow all Democrats and American people to vote for Obama as this country&amp;rsquo;s next President.  Otherwise, they are giving the presidency to McCain. This will in fact split the very votes that we need.</p><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsflavor.com%2FOpinions%2FHillary-Should-Drop-Out-of-the-Race.118309"><img src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsflavor.com%2FOpinions%2FHillary-Should-Drop-Out-of-the-Race.118309" border="0"/></a>]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 10:50:57 PST</pubDate></item>
<item>
<title>What Will Senator Hillary Clinton's Next Job Be?</title>
<link>http://www.newsflavor.com/Politics/US-Politics/What-Will-Senator-Hillary-Clintons-Next-Job-Be.111560</link>
<description>
<![CDATA[<p>There seems to be a below the surface conversation, regarding
 
what would be the next job, that Senator Clinton would want
 
to undertake, should she not be successful, in obtaining the
 
Democratic nomination for President. Would she do, as Senator
 
Ted Kennedy did, when he ran unsuccessfully for the nomination,
 
against Jimmy Carter, and return to the Senate, becoming an
 
outstanding leader of the Democratic party. Or perhaps, she might
 
try her hand at governing the state of  New York, and run for
 
Governor.</p>
<p>At this point, it is anyone's guess, what the Senator from New York
 
will do. Her friends and supporters are hoping, she will have enough
 
support, when this race is over to move on with dignity, and regroup
 
her efforts, to have a major say in the party, should she not win the
 
nomination of the party.</p>
<p>Things are beginning to come together, which would seem to indicate
 
that the nomination, will not be bestowed upon Senator Clinton, this
 
time around. Senator Obama, has garnered the most popular votes, the
 
most pledged delegates, and the most states won. He does not yet have
 
the magic number of 2,025 needed to win the nomination outright.
 
But, he is much closer to that number, than Mrs. Clinton.  At last count,
 
he had a total of 1,646, while her total was 1,511.  Washington Post
 
columnist Robert Novak, reported that, he had spoken to about ten
 
of the Super Delegates, who were supporters of Senator Clinton, and
 
all of them said, in essence, they would be supporting her to the very
 
end, but not one of them, could see anyway, that she would be the
 
nominee, when the race ended.</p>
<p>The Super Delegates, have to decide, who they will vote for, to be the
 
candidate, running against the Republican, presumptive nominee,
 
Senator John McCain, in the November general election.  With the
 
momentum, apparently behind Senator Obama, in spite of the dust
 
up, in recent days over remarks made by Senator Obama.  At a San
 
Francisco fundraiser, over the weekend, certain words he spoke, were
 
taken as elitist.  He had to explain what he meant, when he said people
 
in rural areas were &amp;ldquo;bitter&amp;rdquo;, about their circumstances, and they often
 
turn, to guns and religion and against people, who don't look like
 
they do. This was quickly pounced upon, by Senators, Clinton and
 
McCain, and portrayed as being elitist. As one reporter said, it is
 
quite amazing, to portray a person, who was abandoned by his father
 
at the age of two, lost his mother to cancer at an early age, raised by
 
his grandparents, who depended, reportedly, on food stamps, and
 
worked his way through college with loans and scholarships, as being
 
elitist. But this, as they say, is the political game of hardball, you use
 
what you have, as is the case with most politicians. Senator Obama
 
has tried, with limited success, to explain what he meant.</p>
<p>Senator Obama, despite, all of this, currently has a seven point
 
edge over Senator Clinton, in the national polls. Things could change,
 
but for the moment, Senator Clinton's argument, that Senator Obama
 
is unelectable, does not appear to be correct. The Super Delegates will
 
choose, who they think, could best beat Senator McCain. Since Super
 
Tuesday One, Senator Clinton has lost two Super Delegates, Senator
 
Obama, has picked up fifty-four, if reported correctly.</p>
<p>Over the weekend, at a dinner in Philadelphia, Governor Ed Rendell
 
reportedly said, that the controversy over the words, spoken by Senator
 
Obama might take a few points off of his polling numbers, but in the
 
long run, it would not cost him the nomination, also that the words
 
would be forgotten by November. Governor Rendell, is an ardent
 
supporter of Senator Clinton, it would then appear, that reality is setting
 
in, and observant people are slowly coming to the conclusion, that
 
Senator Obama, as depicted on Saturday Night Live, will be the next
 
President of the United States. Not withstanding, he has to fare well
 
against Senator John McCain. But with Mr. McCain's &amp;ldquo; one-hundred
 
year&amp;rdquo; war stance, and the country wanting the Iraq war to end, Senator
 
McCain may just be on the wrong side of the war issue.</p>
<p>It is therefore very interesting, that whispers are being heard, and
 
speculation, is going on, as to what Senator Clinton might pursue next.
 
The word is, that she might run for Governor of New York in 2009.
 
This may be the perfect venue for Mrs. Clinton, depending on whether
 
or not she becomes the Democratic nominee. She would bring
 
a great deal of clot and expertise to the governorship, as well as
 
bringing with her, the former President Bill Clinton. First couple of
 
New York would be a very interesting place, for a very politically
 
astute pair. New York, would surely welcome them, although, Mayor
 
Bloomberg might have his eye on the same prize in 2009. Time
 
will certainly tell.</p><a href="http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsflavor.com%2FPolitics%2FUS-Politics%2FWhat-Will-Senator-Hillary-Clintons-Next-Job-Be.111560"><img src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?x=&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.newsflavor.com%2FPolitics%2FUS-Politics%2FWhat-Will-Senator-Hillary-Clintons-Next-Job-Be.111560" border="0"/></a>]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 04:59:48 PST</pubDate></item>
</channel>
</rss>
